<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Help The Middle Class &#187; Stimulus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://helpthemiddleclass.com/category/money/stimulus-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com</link>
	<description>News and Information For The Heart Of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama Still Plans On &#8216;Redistribution Of Wealth&#8217; To Pay For Deficit (Los Angeles Times)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 and individuals making more than $200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 will not only pay new healthcare-related taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but also face the likely expiration of upper-income tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush. As a result]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faced with the need to pay for healthcare while also trying to rein in the deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families earning more than $250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Still Plans On 'Redistribution Of Wealth' To Pay For Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[see a chance to limit some of the political and economic pain by putting more of the burden on the country's highest earners. But Republicans are already hammering Obama for leading a broad-scale redi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[these Americans could be tapped for about $650 billion in additional taxes over the next 10 years -- a prospect that is loaded with both political opportunity and peril.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[With enactment of his signature healthcare law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Reporting from Washington

With enactment of his signature healthcare law, President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-income taxpayers, the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.
Families earning more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 20px;"></p>
<div class="storyDateline" style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Reporting from Washington</div>
<p></span></p>
<p>With enactment of his signature healthcare law, President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-income taxpayers, the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.</p>
<p>Families earning more than $250,000 and individuals making more than $200,000 will not only pay new healthcare-related taxes, but also face the likely expiration of upper-income tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush. As a result, these Americans could be tapped for about $650 billion in additional taxes over the next 10 years &#8212; a prospect that is loaded with both political opportunity and peril.</p>
<p>Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress, faced with the need to pay for healthcare while also trying to rein in the deficit, see a chance to limit some of the political and economic pain by putting more of the burden on the country&#8217;s highest earners. But Republicans are already hammering Obama for leading a broad-scale redistribution of income that could threaten the economic recovery.</p>
<p><strong><em>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE LOS ANGELES TIMES</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/health/healthcare/la-na-taxes8-2010apr08,0,4756651.story">Tax burden mounting for high earners &#8211; latimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ECONOMY RECOVERY?  Blockbuster, Borders &amp; Rite Aid &#8216;On The Edge Of Bankruptcy&#8217; (Investopedia.com)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/economy-recovery-blockbuster-borders-rite-aid-on-the-edge-of-bankruptcy-investopedia-com/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/economy-recovery-blockbuster-borders-rite-aid-on-the-edge-of-bankruptcy-investopedia-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borders & Rite Aid 'On The Edge Of Bankruptcy']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY RECOVERY? Blockbuster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many major companies like Circuit City and Linens &#8216;n Things went bankrupt during the economic crisis of 2008-2009. These companies folded under high debt levels and a decline in sales. Just because some companies were able to survive the economic downturn of the past few years doesn&#8217;t mean they are out of the woods yet. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many major companies like Circuit City and Linens &#8216;n Things went <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bankruptcy.asp">bankrupt</a> during the economic crisis of 2008-2009. These companies folded under high debt levels and a decline in <a class="iAs" style="border-bottom: 0.075em solid darkgreen ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; font-size: 100% ! important; text-decoration: underline ! important; padding-bottom: 1px ! important; color: darkgreen ! important; background-color: transparent ! important; background-image: none; padding-top: 0pt; padding-right: 0pt; padding-left: 0pt;" href="http://financialedge.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0410/Businesses-On-The-Brink-Change-Or-Fail.aspx#" target="_blank">sales</a>. Just because some companies were able to survive the economic downturn of the past few years doesn&#8217;t mean they are out of the woods yet. Companies like Blockbuster (NYSE:<a href="http://simulator.investopedia.com/stocks/BBI">BBI</a>) and Borders (NYSE:<a href="http://simulator.investopedia.com/stocks/BGP">BGP</a>) are going down with their industries, meaning that making drastic changes is their only option. Here are five major companies that are struggling &#8211; it is unlikely that all will survive.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK TO INVESTOPEDIA.COM</strong><a href="http://financialedge.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0410/Businesses-On-The-Brink-Change-Or-Fail.aspx">:  Businesses On The Brink: Change Or Fail? &#8211; Investopedia.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/economy-recovery-blockbuster-borders-rite-aid-on-the-edge-of-bankruptcy-investopedia-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NOW THEY TELL US: Nonpartisan CBO Reports Deficit Will Be Much Worse Than Obama Says (MONEYNEWS.COM)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/29/now-they-tell-us-nonpartisan-cbo-reports-deficit-will-be-much-worse-than-obama-says-moneynews-com/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/29/now-they-tell-us-nonpartisan-cbo-reports-deficit-will-be-much-worse-than-obama-says-moneynews-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A new congressional report released Friday says the United States' long-term fiscal woes are even worse than predicted by President Barack Obama's grim budget submission last month.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO Reports Deficit Will Be Much Worse Than Obama Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowd out private investment in the economy and ultimately erode the nation's standard of living.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[never dipping below 4 percent of the size of the economy over the next decade. Economists say that deficits of that size are unsustainable and could put upward pressure on interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Still]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The agency says its future-year predictions of tax revenues are more pessimistic than the administration's. That's because CBO projects slightly slower economic growth than the White House.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The deficit picture has turned alarmingly worse since the recession that started at the end of 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Feb. 1 White House budget plan was a largely stand-pat document that avoided difficult decisions on curbing the unsustainable growth of federal benefit programs like the Medicare health care progr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts that Obama's budget plans would generate deficits over the upcoming decade that would total $9.8 trillion. That's $1.2 trillion more than predicted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[which provides health care to the poor and disabled.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new congressional report released Friday says the United States&#8217; long-term fiscal woes are even worse than predicted by President Barack Obama&#8217;s grim budget submission last month.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts that Obama&#8217;s budget plans would generate deficits over the upcoming decade that would total $9.8 trillion. That&#8217;s $1.2 trillion more than predicted by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-9190" title="money_bags" src="http://helpthemiddleclass.com/wp-content/uploads/money_bags2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />A new congressional report released Friday says the United States&#8217; long-term fiscal woes are even worse than predicted by President Barack Obama&#8217;s grim budget submission last month.</p>
<p>The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts that Obama&#8217;s budget plans would generate deficits over the upcoming decade that would total $9.8 trillion. That&#8217;s $1.2 trillion more than predicted by the administration.</p>
<p>The agency says its future-year predictions of tax revenues are more pessimistic than the administration&#8217;s. That&#8217;s because CBO projects slightly slower economic growth than the White House.</p>
<p>The deficit picture has turned alarmingly worse since the recession that started at the end of 2007, never dipping below 4 percent of the size of the economy over the next decade. Economists say that deficits of that size are unsustainable and could put upward pressure on interest rates, crowd out private investment in the economy and ultimately erode the nation&#8217;s standard of living.</p>
<p>Still, the Feb. 1 White House budget plan was a largely stand-pat document that avoided difficult decisions on curbing the unsustainable growth of federal benefit programs like the Medicare health care program for the elderly and Medicaid, which provides health care to the poor and disabled.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR MONEYNEWS.COM: </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://moneynews.com/Headline/US-Budget-Deficits/2010/03/08/id/351910?s=al" target="_blank">Moneynews &#8211; Congressional Report: Deficit Will Be Much Worse Than Obama Says</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/29/now-they-tell-us-nonpartisan-cbo-reports-deficit-will-be-much-worse-than-obama-says-moneynews-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs Bill Signed, But Job-Creation Advocates Say Obama Just Doesn&#8217;t Get It (Huffington Post)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/18/jobs-bill-signed-but-job-creation-advocates-say-obama-just-doesnt-get-it-huffington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/18/jobs-bill-signed-but-job-creation-advocates-say-obama-just-doesnt-get-it-huffington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Job News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" he said. "You've got to go after this with big ideas and transformational ideas."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" said Huff Post blogger Robert Kuttner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["We have to come up with a non-belligerent equivalent of the kind of economic shock produced by World War II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a Huffington Post blogger who the event's moderator (and HuffPost blogger) Steve Clemons identified as a "former hard-driving Republican CEO"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and the Struggle to Control our Economic Future".]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[As for the bill's emphasis on incentivizing small and medium-sized businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[But Job-Creation Advocates Say Obama Just Doesn't Get It]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief economic adviser Larry Summers was at the National Press Club trying to make the administration sound tough on financial regulatory reform -- and a critical bunch of economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindery said: "I can't fix Dayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Bill Signed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Hindery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mocked the bill's emphasis on tax breaks.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio" that way. "We have to have a large-business orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policymakers and policy wonks were gathering at the New America Foundation to bemoan the fundamental unseriousness of the administration's approach to economic recovery and job creation.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama was in the Rose Garden trying to make the jobs bill he was signing sound like a big success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This morning in Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street's Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who is editor of the American Prospect and author of the upcoming book: "A Presidency in Peril: The Inside Story of Obama's Promise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning in Washington, President Obama was in the Rose Garden trying to make the jobs bill he was signing sound like a big success, chief economic adviser Larry Summers was at the National Press Club trying to make the administration sound tough on financial regulatory reform &#8212; and a critical bunch of economists, policymakers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning in Washington, President Obama was in the Rose Garden trying to make the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/18/obama-jobs-bill-will-help_n_504240.html" target="_hplink">jobs bill he was signing</a> sound like a big success, chief economic adviser Larry Summers was at the National Press Club trying to make the administration <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/18/summers-hits-boehner-defe_n_504086.html" target="_hplink">sound tough on financial regulatory reform</a> &#8212; and a critical bunch of economists, policymakers and policy wonks were gathering at the New America Foundation to bemoan the fundamental unseriousness of the administration&#8217;s approach to economic recovery and job creation.</p>
<p>Including that so-called jobs bill.</p>
<p>Leo Hindery, a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leo-hindery-jr" target="_hplink">Huffington Post blogger</a> who the event&#8217;s moderator (and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-clemons" target="_hplink">HuffPost blogger</a>) Steve Clemons identified as a &#8220;former hard-driving Republican CEO&#8221;, mocked the bill&#8217;s emphasis on tax breaks.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have never hired a man or a woman based on a tax credit,&#8221; Hindery said.</p>
<p>Employers hire when they are certain they will have a growing market for their products &#8212; and they don&#8217;t have that certainty now, Hindery explained.</p>
<p>As for the bill&#8217;s emphasis on incentivizing small and medium-sized businesses, Hindery said: &#8220;I can&#8217;t fix Dayton, Ohio&#8221; that way. &#8220;We have to have a large-business orientation,&#8221; he said. &#8220;You&#8217;ve got to go after this with big ideas and transformational ideas.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We have to come up with a non-belligerent equivalent of the kind of economic shock produced by World War II,&#8221; said <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner" target="_hplink">Huff Post blogger</a> Robert Kuttner, who is editor of the <em>American Prospect</em> and author of the upcoming book: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Presidency-Peril-Promise-Struggle-Economic/dp/1603582703" target="_hplink">&#8220;A Presidency in Peril: The Inside Story of Obama&#8217;s Promise, Wall Street&#8217;s Power, and the Struggle to Control our Economic Future&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THE LINK BELOW FOR THE HUFFINGTON POST:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/18/job-creation-advocates-sa_n_504237.html" target="_blank">Job-Creation Advocates Say Obama Just Doesn&#8217;t Get It</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/18/jobs-bill-signed-but-job-creation-advocates-say-obama-just-doesnt-get-it-huffington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Passes $140 Billion Bill Extending Jobless Claims (CNN)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/10/senate-passes-140-billion-bill-extending-jobless-claims-cnn/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/10/senate-passes-140-billion-bill-extending-jobless-claims-cnn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Job News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have voiced concerns about adding to the deficit.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is the latest job creation effort to go before lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawmakers have come under pressure from both the White House and unemployed Americans to do more to spur hiring. But after many speeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[officials have enacted little to help the nearly 15 million looking for work.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particularly Congressional Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passed by a 62-36 vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Passes $140 Billion Bill Extending Jobless Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The latest efforts -- which include a $15 billion job creation initiative that the Senate will take up next -- don't sit well with members from either side of the aisle. Some say that more must be don]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Senate on Wednesday approved a wide-ranging bill that would push back the deadline to file for extended unemployment insurance until year-end and extends dozens of expired tax breaks.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[though it contains virtually no new initiatives to boost employment. Its price tag has wavered between $140 billion and $150 billion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[where a quick passage is anything but assured.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[which is partially offset. Its next stop is the House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=8995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate on Wednesday approved a wide-ranging bill that would push back the deadline to file for extended unemployment insurance until year-end and extends dozens of expired tax breaks.
The bill, passed by a 62-36 vote, is the latest job creation effort to go before lawmakers, though it contains virtually no new initiatives to boost employment. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate on Wednesday approved a wide-ranging bill that would push back the deadline to file for extended unemployment insurance until year-end and extends dozens of expired tax breaks.</p>
<p>The bill, passed by a 62-36 vote, is the latest job creation effort to go before lawmakers, though it contains virtually no new initiatives to boost employment. Its price tag has wavered between $140 billion and $150 billion, which is partially offset. Its next stop is the House, where a quick passage is anything but assured.</p>
<p>Lawmakers have come under pressure from both the White House and unemployed Americans to do more to spur hiring. But after many speeches, officials have enacted little to help the nearly 15 million looking for work.</p>
<p>The latest efforts &#8212; which include a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/04/news/economy/House_passes_jobs_bill/index.htm?postversion=2010030512">$15 billion job creation initiative</a> that the Senate will take up next &#8212; don&#8217;t sit well with members from either side of the aisle. Some say that more must be done to boost employment. Others, particularly Congressional Republicans, have voiced concerns about adding to the deficit.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THE LINK BELOW FOR CNN:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/10/news/economy/Senate_jobs_bill/index.htm?hpt=T2" target="_blank">Senate passes $140 billion bill extending jobless claims &#8211; Mar. 10, 2010</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/03/10/senate-passes-140-billion-bill-extending-jobless-claims-cnn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FACT CHECKING THE STIMULUS ACT:  JOBLESS RATE HIGH, GROWTH SLOW (AP/YAHOO!)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/18/fact-checking-the-stimulus-act-jobless-rate-high-growth-slow-apyahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/18/fact-checking-the-stimulus-act-jobless-rate-high-growth-slow-apyahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[And the nation's recent economic growth is real]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Despite Obama's bold promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[even though the government has spent just one-third of the massive stimulus plan. The program_ originally estimated at $787 billion but now priced at $862 billion — is to continue pumping federal mone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACT CHECKING THE STIMULUS ACT: JOBLESS RATE HIGH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GROWTH SLOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helping to keep the anemic construction industry afloat. But job losses still were significant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment remains stubbornly high. But job losses have slowed dramatically.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with as many as one in four construction workers unemployed.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[• Many states and local governments owe their fiscal survival to the stimulus. But those governments are scrambling to find ways to fill the holes in the coming year.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[• Thousands of road and bridge projects broke ground with stimulus money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=8773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the stimulus work or not? A year after Congress passed President Barack Obama&#8217;s huge economic revival plan, the results are mixed — and hardly final.
Despite Obama&#8217;s bold promises, unemployment remains stubbornly high. But job losses have slowed dramatically.
And the nation&#8217;s recent economic growth is real, even though the government has spent just one-third of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the stimulus work or not? A year after Congress passed <span id="lw_1266469150_0" class="yshortcuts" style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">President Barack Obama</span>&#8217;s huge economic revival plan, the results are mixed — and hardly final.</p>
<p>Despite Obama&#8217;s bold promises, unemployment remains stubbornly high. But job losses have slowed dramatically.</p>
<p>And the nation&#8217;s recent economic growth is real, even though the government has spent just one-third of the massive stimulus plan. The program_ originally estimated at $787 billion but now priced at $862 billion — is to continue pumping federal money into the economy into 2011.</p>
<p>One year into the program:</p>
<p>• Many states and local governments owe their fiscal survival to the stimulus. But those governments are scrambling to find ways to fill the holes in the coming year.</p>
<p>• Thousands of road and bridge projects broke ground with stimulus money, helping to keep the anemic construction industry afloat. But job losses still were significant, with as many as one in four <span id="lw_1266469150_1" class="yshortcuts">construction workers</span> unemployed.</p>
<p>Obama used Wednesday&#8217;s one-year anniversary to offer his own assessment and, predictably, rated the effort an unprecedented success.</p>
<p>&#8220;There has never been a program of this scale, moved at this speed, that has been enacted as effectively and as transparently as the recovery act,&#8221; the president declared.</p>
<p>But the legacy of the <span id="lw_1266469150_2" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">American Recovery and Reinvestment Act</span> is yet to be sealed.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_stimulus_fact_check" target="_blank"><em><strong>FOR CONTINUATION OF THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR YAHOO! NEWS: </strong></em>Judging stimulus: Jobless rate high, growth real &#8211; Yahoo! News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/18/fact-checking-the-stimulus-act-jobless-rate-high-growth-slow-apyahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Declares Stimulus A Success (Yahoo!/AP)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/17/obama-declares-stimulus-a-success-yahooap/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/17/obama-declares-stimulus-a-success-yahooap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor/Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Job News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["It doesn't yet feel like much of a recovery."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["It doesn't yet feel like much of a recovery."Marking the anniversary of the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as he has many times before]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education and infrastructure.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extended social service benefits and huge investments in energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama acknowledged that to them]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama aimed his message at people skeptical about the expensive relief measure and Republican lawmakers who voted against it and continue to hammer him about it.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama explained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama hailed Wednesday's one-year-old economic stimulus law as an accomplishment that staved off another Great Depression and kept up to 2 million people on the job.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Still]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[that the stimulus plan was composed of tax cuts for most Americans along with help for state governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[To the public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with millions still out of work and losing patience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=8767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama hailed Wednesday&#8217;s one-year-old economic stimulus law as an accomplishment that staved off another Great Depression and kept up to 2 million people on the job.
Still, with millions still out of work and losing patience, Obama acknowledged that to them, &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t yet feel like much of a recovery.&#8221;
Marking the anniversary of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="lw_1266465417_0" class="yshortcuts" style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">President Barack Obama</span> hailed Wednesday&#8217;s one-year-old <span id="lw_1266465417_1" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">economic stimulus</span> law as an accomplishment that staved off another <span id="lw_1266465417_2" class="yshortcuts" style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">Great Depression</span> and kept up to 2 million people on the job.</p>
<p>Still, with millions still out of work and losing patience, Obama acknowledged that to them, &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t yet feel like much of a recovery.&#8221;</p>
<p>Marking the anniversary of the $787 billion <span id="lw_1266465417_3" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; cursor: pointer;">American Recovery and Reinvestment Act</span>, Obama aimed his message at people skeptical about the expensive relief measure and Republican lawmakers who voted against it and continue to hammer him about it.</p>
<p>To the public, Obama explained, as he has many times before, that the stimulus plan was composed of tax cuts for most Americans along with help for state governments, extended social service benefits and huge investments in energy, education and infrastructure.</p>
<p>&#8220;One year later, it is largely thanks to the recovery act that a second depression is no longer a possibility,&#8221; Obama said.</p>
<p>To his Republican critics, who say the bill was a costly, debt-financed blunder that has not delivered on the promise of job creation, Obama challenged them to take up the case with people who have stayed employed or have found help solely because he and the Democratic-run Congress acted.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100218/ap_on_bi_ge/us_obama_stimulus;_ylt=AhVWsGEonWoaJJU2Q4zC7dKs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTNoZTBwdjZsBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMjE4L3VzX29iYW1hX3N0aW11bHVzBGNjb2RlA21vc3Rwb3B1bGFyBGNwb3MDMgRwb3MDNgRwdANob21lX2Nva2UEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDb2JhbWFzYXlzc3Rp" target="_blank"><em><strong>FOR CONTINUATION OF THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR YAHOO!/AP: </strong></em>Obama says stimulus bill saved troubled economy &#8211; Yahoo! News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/17/obama-declares-stimulus-a-success-yahooap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Wave Of Foreclosures By The End of 2010 is Predicted (Los Angeles Times)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/17/new-wave-of-foreclosures-by-the-end-of-2010-is-predicted-los-angeles-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/17/new-wave-of-foreclosures-by-the-end-of-2010-is-predicted-los-angeles-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[About 4 million U.S. homeowners are 90 days or more delinquent on their loans or in foreclosure proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and they said they were considering revisions to make it more effective.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announced a year ago this week by President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks participating in the Home Affordable Modification Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[has had growing pains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have been slow to turn temporarily reduced mortgage payments into permanent ones.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's Economy.com says. A federal loan modification program is helping a relative few. Reporting fr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Wave Of Foreclosures By The End of 2010 is Predicted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration officials acknowledge that the $75-billion program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporting from Washington - Experts fear that a new wave of foreclosures will hit this year as prolonged unemployment makes it difficult for millions of homeowners to pay their mortgages -- and many o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Still]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the program is expected to show continued progress when data from January are released Wednesday after a strong push by Treasury Department officials to get banks to make more of the modifications per]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[which offers banks cash incentives to reduce payments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=8751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 4 million U.S. homeowners are 90 days or more delinquent on their loans or in foreclosure proceedings, Moody&#8217;s Economy.com says. A federal loan modification program is helping a relative few.
Reporting from Washington &#8211;                      [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>About 4 million U.S. homeowners are 90 days or more delinquent on their loans or in foreclosure proceedings, Moody&#8217;s Economy.com says. A federal loan modification program is helping a relative few.</h2>
<p>Reporting from Washington &#8211;                                         Experts fear that a new wave of foreclosures will hit this year as prolonged unemployment makes it difficult for millions of homeowners to pay their mortgages &#8212; and many of them aren&#8217;t likely to get much help from a federal program aimed at keeping them in their houses.</p>
<p>Banks participating in the Home Affordable Modification Program, announced a year ago this week by President Obama, have been slow to turn temporarily reduced mortgage payments into permanent ones.</p>
<p>&#8220;The overarching sense is that the mortgage modification process has not worked that well,&#8221; said Bert Ely, an independent banking consultant.</p>
<p>Obama administration officials acknowledge that the $75-billion program, which offers banks cash incentives to reduce payments, has had growing pains, and they said they were considering revisions to make it more effective.</p>
<p>Still, the program is expected to show continued progress when data from January are released Wednesday after a strong push by Treasury Department officials to get banks to make more of the modifications permanent.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-mortgage-mods17-2010feb17,0,7573498.story?track=rss&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+latimes%2Fmostviewed+%28L.A.+Times+-+Most+Viewed+Stories%29" target="_blank"><em><strong>FOR CONTINUATION OF THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE LOS ANGELES TIMES: </strong></em>New wave of foreclosures by end of 2010 is feared &#8211; latimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/17/new-wave-of-foreclosures-by-the-end-of-2010-is-predicted-los-angeles-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JOBS UPDATE:  Temp Jobs No Longer Lead To Permanent Hirings (Yahoo!/AP)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/15/jobs-update-temp-jobs-no-longer-lead-to-permanent-hirings-yahooap/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/15/jobs-update-temp-jobs-no-longer-lead-to-permanent-hirings-yahooap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor/Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Job News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" says John Silvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["I think temporary hiring is less useful a signal than it used to be]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief economist at Wells Fargo. "Companies aren't testing the waters by turning to temporary firms. They just want part-time workers."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies also worry about higher costs related to taxes or health care measures being weighed by Congress and statehouses. That's what Chris DeCapua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies have hired more temps for four straight months. Yet they remain reluctant to make permanent hires because of doubts about the recovery's durability.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is hearing from clients.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it's long been seen as a sign they'll soon hire permanent workers.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owner of employment firm Dawson Careers in Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexting with Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temp Jobs No Longer Lead To Permanent Hirings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The reasons vary. But economists and business people say the main obstacle is that employers lack confidence that the economic rebound has staying power. Many fear their sales and the overall economy ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[When employers hire temporary staff after a recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=8728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; It&#8217;s not the signal it used to be.
When employers hire temporary staff after a recession, it&#8217;s long been seen as a sign they&#8217;ll soon hire permanent workers.
Not these days.
Companies have hired more temps for four straight months. Yet they remain reluctant to make permanent hires because of doubts about the recovery&#8217;s durability.
Even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; It&#8217;s not the signal it used to be.</p>
<p><!-- Article Related Media -->When employers hire temporary staff after a recession, it&#8217;s long been seen as a sign they&#8217;ll soon hire permanent workers.</p>
<p>Not these days.</p>
<p>Companies have hired more temps for four straight months. Yet they remain reluctant to make permanent hires because of doubts about the recovery&#8217;s durability.</p>
<p>Even companies that are boosting production seem inclined to get by with their existing workers, plus temporary staff if necessary.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think temporary hiring is less useful a signal than it used to be,&#8221; says John Silvia, chief economist at Wells Fargo. &#8220;Companies aren&#8217;t testing the waters by turning to temporary firms. They just want part-time workers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The reasons vary. But economists and business people say the main obstacle is that employers lack confidence that the economic rebound has staying power. Many fear their sales and the overall economy will remain weak or even falter as consumers spend cautiously.</p>
<p>Companies also worry about higher costs related to taxes or health care measures being weighed by Congress and statehouses. That&#8217;s what Chris DeCapua, owner of employment firm Dawson Careers in Columbus, Ohio, is hearing from clients.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Use-of-temps-may-no-longer-apf-2453922630.html?x=0" target="_blank"><em><strong>FOR CONTINUATION OF THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR YAHOO! </strong></em>Use of temps may no longer signal permanent hiring &#8211; Yahoo! Finance</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/15/jobs-update-temp-jobs-no-longer-lead-to-permanent-hirings-yahooap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Allows Debt to Rise $1.9 Trillion (New York Times)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/05/house-allows-debt-to-rise-1-9-trillion-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/05/house-allows-debt-to-rise-1-9-trillion-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 for every United States resident.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 per person.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an increase of about $6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and the deficit is approaching $1.6 trillion under the budget submitted by President Obama this week.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approved 217 to 212]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic leaders devised the increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[even though they routinely supported increases in the borrowing cap when their party controlled Congress or when George W. Bush was president.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Allows Debt to Rise $1.9 Trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is only enough to keep the government afloat for about another year as it borrows more than 40 cents of every dollar it spends.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeff bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mostly from Republican-leaning districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The accumulated debt already amounts to roughly $40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The budget is more than $3.7 trillion this year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The debt increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The House voted Thursday to allow the government to go $1.9 trillion deeper in debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thirty-seven Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to $14.3 trillion in the cap on federal borrowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to ensure that the rank and file will not have to vote on another increase before the November midterm elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voted against the measure. So did all Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[when they will face voters who are angry over government spending and debt.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=8604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House voted Thursday to allow the government to go $1.9 trillion deeper in debt, an increase of about $6,000 for every United States resident.
The accumulated debt already amounts to roughly $40,000 per person.
The debt increase, approved 217 to 212, is only enough to keep the government afloat for about another year as it borrows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House voted Thursday to allow the government to go $1.9 trillion deeper in debt, an increase of about $6,000 for every United States resident.</p>
<p>The accumulated debt already amounts to roughly $40,000 per person.</p>
<p>The debt increase, approved 217 to 212, is only enough to keep the government afloat for about another year as it borrows more than 40 cents of every dollar it spends.</p>
<p>The budget is more than $3.7 trillion this year, and the deficit is approaching $1.6 trillion under the budget submitted by <a title="More articles about Barack Obama." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per">President Obama</a> this week.</p>
<p>Democratic leaders devised the increase, to $14.3 trillion in the cap on federal borrowing, to ensure that the rank and file will not have to vote on another increase before the November midterm elections, when they will face voters who are angry over government spending and debt.</p>
<p>Passage of the bill sends it to Mr. Obama, who will sign it to avoid a first-ever default on United States obligations.</p>
<p>Thirty-seven Democrats, mostly from Republican-leaning districts, voted against the measure. So did all Republicans, even though they routinely supported increases in the borrowing cap when their party controlled Congress or when <a title="More articles about George W. Bush." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/george_w_bush/index.html?inline=nyt-per">George W. Bush</a> was president.</p>
<p><em><strong>FOR CONTINUATION OF THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR NEW YORK TIMES: </strong></em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/us/politics/05debt.html?nl=us&amp;emc=politicsemailema4" target="_blank">House Allows Debt to Rise $1.9 Trillion &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/02/05/house-allows-debt-to-rise-1-9-trillion-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

