<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Help The Middle Class &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://helpthemiddleclass.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com</link>
	<description>News and Information For The Heart Of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OPINION:  Wall Street Profits While Main Street Suffers (New York TImes)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/21/opinion-wall-street-profits-while-main-street-suffers-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/21/opinion-wall-street-profits-while-main-street-suffers-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Pundits Speak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 1964 concurring opinion deciding Jacobellis v. Ohio, Associate Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wrote about “hard-core pornography” and his struggle to define it: “Perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it.”
Using Potter’s indisputable logic, it’s hard not to see something obscene in how Wall [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 1964 concurring opinion deciding Jacobellis v. Ohio, Associate Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wrote about “hard-core pornography” and his struggle to define it: “Perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it.”</p>
<p>Using Potter’s indisputable logic, it’s hard not to see something obscene in how Wall Street reaped massive profits and bonuses in 2009 — and continues to do so, as is clear from Monday’s announcement by Citigroup that it had earned $4.4 billion in the first quarter of 2010, which was even more than earned by Bank of America ($3.2 billion) and JPMorgan Chase ($3.3 billion) in the same period — merely 18 months after trillions of dollars of American taxpayers’ treasure was used to save a financial system brought to the precipice by Wall Street’s greed and irresponsible risk-taking. Goldman Sachs, which is facing a civil fraud suit filed by Washington regulators, is expected to report robust earnings Tuesday morning as well.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES:  </strong> <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/youre-welcome-wall-street/?ref=opinion" target="_blank">You’re Welcome, Wall Street &#8211; Opinionator Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/21/opinion-wall-street-profits-while-main-street-suffers-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010&#8217;s Worst-Selling Housing Markets (Forbes.com)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/12/2010s-worst-selling-housing-markets-forbes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/12/2010s-worst-selling-housing-markets-forbes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buying & Selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010's Worst-Selling Housing Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a likely contender for the top ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America's Top Ten Worst-Selling Housing Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America's Worst-Selling Housing Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an aggregator of multiple listing service data. Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[based on data fromZipRealty (nasdaq: ZIPR - news - people)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[based on National Association of Realtors data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.; Los Angeles; Tampa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver; San Diego; Baltimore; Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fla.; and Chicago.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fla.; Phoenix; Orlando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[n compiling our list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[then calculated how quickly these cities are shedding inventory from their peaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[was not considered due to irregularities in inventory reporting.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we looked at price growth and sales rates in the country's 40 largest metropolitan statistical areas. We took the cities in the midst of year-over-year price declines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[which occurred between four and six months ago]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Miami-area home sellers looking to unload their properties might want to make sure they have comfortable couches.
It looks like they&#8217;re going to be there a while.
That&#8217;s because Miami tops our list of the nation&#8217;s most sedentary housing markets. These 10 spots feature a potent mix of dropping prices and sluggish sales rates. Also on the list: Denver; San Diego; Baltimore; Washington, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial; line-height: normal;"></p>
<p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Miami-area home sellers looking to unload their properties might want to make sure they have comfortable couches.</p>
<p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">It looks like they&#8217;re going to be there a while.</p>
<p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">That&#8217;s because <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_11.html?thisSpeed=20000" target="_blank">Miami</a> tops our list of the nation&#8217;s most sedentary housing markets. These 10 spots feature a potent mix of dropping prices and sluggish sales rates. Also on the list: <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_2.html?thisSpeed=20000" target="_blank">Denver</a>; <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_3.html?thisSpeed=20000" target="_blank">San Diego</a>; <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_4.html?thisSpeed=20000" target="_blank">Baltimore</a>; <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_6.html?thisSpeed=20000">Washington, D.C.</a>; <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_7.html?thisSpeed=20000">Los Angeles</a>; <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_8.html?thisSpeed=20000">Tampa, Fla.</a>; <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_9.html?thisSpeed=20000">Phoenix</a>; <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_10.html?thisSpeed=20000">Orlando, Fla.</a>; and <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate_slide_5.html?thisSpeed=20000" target="_blank">Chicago</a>.</p>
<p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">In compiling our list, we looked at <a style="color: #003399; border-bottom-style: dotted; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-bottom-color: initial; cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.forbes.com/price%20growth">price growth</a> and sales rates in the country&#8217;s 40 largest metropolitan statistical areas. We took the cities in the midst of year-over-year price declines, based on National Association of Realtors data, then calculated how quickly these cities are shedding inventory from their peaks, which occurred between four and six months ago, based on data from<strong style="font-weight: bold;">ZipRealty</strong> (nasdaq: <a class="maintkrlink" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration: none;" href="http://finapps.forbes.com/finapps/jsp/finance/compinfo/CIAtAGlance.jsp?tkr=ZIPR">ZIPR</a> - <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/company_news.jhtml?ticker=ZIPR">news </a>- <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.forbes.com/peopletracker/results.jhtml?startRow=0&amp;name=&amp;ticker=ZIPR">people</a>), an aggregator of multiple listing service data. Atlanta, a likely contender for the top ten, was not considered due to irregularities in inventory reporting.</p>
<p></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate.html" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/15/homes-sales-worst-forbeslife-cx_mw_0415realestate.html"><span style="color: #000000;">TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK TO FORBES:  </span></a>America&#8217;s Worst-Selling Housing Markets &#8211; Forbes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/12/2010s-worst-selling-housing-markets-forbes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie Mae Executives Face Probe.  Must Explain Risky Mortage Decisions (Yahoo! News)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/fannie-mae-executives-face-probe-must-explain-risky-mortage-decisions-yahoo-news/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/fannie-mae-executives-face-probe-must-explain-risky-mortage-decisions-yahoo-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" Levin told the panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Could we really sit out? Would we be permitted to sit out? That's what we were grappling with."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["It posed a number of threats to the company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and Robert Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[As the market turned down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Both executives left Washington-based Fannie Mae after it was seized by regulators in fall 2008. Also scheduled to appear Friday were James Lockhart and Armando Falcon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[both of whom headed up the federal regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combined with the political goal of increasing homeownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Mudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae Executives Face Probe. Must Explain Risky Mortage Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae's former chief executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levin said company executives were concerned about losing relevance as Wall Street companies issued mortgage securities and stole market share.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mudd noted "virtually every other housing sector investor fled the market." Fannie and sibling company Freddie Mac "were specifically required to take up the slack."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testified before a panel examining the roots of the financial crisis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the company's former chief business officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two former Fannie Mae executives said Friday that competitive pressures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[were to blame for the company's decision to back riskier mortgages that fueled the housing bubble.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two former Fannie Mae executives said Friday that competitive pressures, combined with the political goal of increasing homeownership, were to blame for the company&#8217;s decision to back riskier mortgages that fueled the housing bubble.
Daniel Mudd, Fannie Mae&#8217;s former chief executive, and Robert Levin, the company&#8217;s former chief business officer, testified before a panel examining the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two former <span id="lw_1270825069_0" class="yshortcuts">Fannie Mae executives</span> said Friday that competitive pressures, combined with the political goal of increasing homeownership, were to blame for the company&#8217;s decision to back riskier mortgages that fueled the housing bubble.</p>
<p><span id="lw_1270825069_1" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; cursor: pointer;">Daniel Mudd</span>, <span id="lw_1270825069_2" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">Fannie Mae</span>&#8217;s former chief executive, and Robert Levin, the company&#8217;s former chief business officer, testified before a panel examining the roots of the <span id="lw_1270825069_3" class="yshortcuts">financial crisis</span>.</p>
<p>Levin said company executives were concerned about losing relevance as <span id="lw_1270825069_4" class="yshortcuts">Wall Street companies</span> issued mortgage securities and stole market share.</p>
<p>&#8220;It posed a number of threats to the company,&#8221; Levin told the panel, adding, &#8220;Could we really sit out? Would we be permitted to sit out? That&#8217;s what we were grappling with.&#8221;</p>
<p>As the market turned down, Mudd noted &#8220;virtually every other housing sector investor fled the market.&#8221; Fannie and sibling company <span id="lw_1270825069_5" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; cursor: pointer;">Freddie Mac</span> &#8220;were specifically required to take up the slack.&#8221;</p>
<p>Both executives left Washington-based Fannie Mae after it was seized by regulators in fall 2008. Also scheduled to appear Friday were James Lockhart and Armando Falcon, both of whom headed up the <span id="lw_1270825069_6" class="yshortcuts">federal regulator</span> for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.</p>
<p>The inquiry is being held by the congressionally chartered Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Congress created the commission last year to examine the causes of the crisis. The panel&#8217;s goal is to get an in-depth understanding of decisions that inflated the mortgage bubble and triggered a financial crisis that tipped the economy into the longest recession in 70 years. Its report is due Dec. 15.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK</strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100409/ap_on_bi_ge/us_meltdown_investigation" target="_blank">:  Ex-Fannie Mae execs try to defend track record &#8211; Yahoo! News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/fannie-mae-executives-face-probe-must-explain-risky-mortage-decisions-yahoo-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Still Plans On &#8216;Redistribution Of Wealth&#8217; To Pay For Deficit (Los Angeles Times)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 and individuals making more than $200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 will not only pay new healthcare-related taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but also face the likely expiration of upper-income tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush. As a result]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faced with the need to pay for healthcare while also trying to rein in the deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families earning more than $250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Still Plans On 'Redistribution Of Wealth' To Pay For Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[see a chance to limit some of the political and economic pain by putting more of the burden on the country's highest earners. But Republicans are already hammering Obama for leading a broad-scale redi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[these Americans could be tapped for about $650 billion in additional taxes over the next 10 years -- a prospect that is loaded with both political opportunity and peril.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[With enactment of his signature healthcare law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Reporting from Washington

With enactment of his signature healthcare law, President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-income taxpayers, the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.
Families earning more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 20px;"></p>
<div class="storyDateline" style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Reporting from Washington</div>
<p></span></p>
<p>With enactment of his signature healthcare law, President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-income taxpayers, the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.</p>
<p>Families earning more than $250,000 and individuals making more than $200,000 will not only pay new healthcare-related taxes, but also face the likely expiration of upper-income tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush. As a result, these Americans could be tapped for about $650 billion in additional taxes over the next 10 years &#8212; a prospect that is loaded with both political opportunity and peril.</p>
<p>Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress, faced with the need to pay for healthcare while also trying to rein in the deficit, see a chance to limit some of the political and economic pain by putting more of the burden on the country&#8217;s highest earners. But Republicans are already hammering Obama for leading a broad-scale redistribution of income that could threaten the economic recovery.</p>
<p><strong><em>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE LOS ANGELES TIMES</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/health/healthcare/la-na-taxes8-2010apr08,0,4756651.story">Tax burden mounting for high earners &#8211; latimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Nuclear Policy, Something For The &#8216;Left &amp; Right&#8217; (Los Angeles Times)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/obamas-nuclear-something-for-the-left-right-los-angeles-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/obamas-nuclear-something-for-the-left-right-los-angeles-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration officials listened closely to the more conservative advice of Pentagon officials in a yearlong study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Although Obama campaigned on a pledge to overhaul nuclear policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as a step toward reducing U.S. reliance on its most destructive weapons.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declaring some countries off-limits even in wartime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[said people close to the discussions. And they were sensitive to the need to win Republican votes in the Senate for ratification this year of a new arms control treaty with Russia.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Something For The 'Left & Right']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The administration's hedge on the warhead issue was but one example of the caution built into a policy portrayed as a groundbreaking effort to reduce U.S. reliance on nuclear weapons.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The new policy came two days before Obama travels to Prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The nuclear weapons policy sets limits on the use of U.S. warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to sign the new arms reduction treaty with Russia and the week before he holds an international nuclear summit in Washington.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama and his senior aides introduced a new nuclear weapons policy Tuesday with the promise that America would no longer build new nuclear weapons.
&#8220;No new testing, no new warheads,&#8221; Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pledged in a Pentagon briefing.
Yet officials said later that the policy could allow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-9262" title="barack-obama-is-superman" src="http://helpthemiddleclass.com/wp-content/uploads/barack-obama-is-superman5-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />President Obama and his senior aides introduced a new nuclear weapons policy Tuesday with the promise that America would no longer build new nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>&#8220;No new testing, no new warheads,&#8221; Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pledged in a Pentagon briefing.</p>
<p>Yet officials said later that the policy could allow them to bring back older, tested warhead components and designs to build what would be, for all practical purposes, a new weapon.</p>
<p>The administration&#8217;s hedge on the warhead issue was but one example of the caution built into a policy portrayed as a groundbreaking effort to reduce U.S. reliance on nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>Although Obama campaigned on a pledge to overhaul nuclear policy, administration officials listened closely to the more conservative advice of Pentagon officials in a yearlong study, said people close to the discussions. And they were sensitive to the need to win Republican votes in the Senate for ratification this year of a new arms control treaty with Russia.</p>
<p>The nuclear weapons policy sets limits on the use of U.S. warheads, declaring some countries off-limits even in wartime, as a step toward reducing U.S. reliance on its most destructive weapons.</p>
<p>The new policy came two days before Obama travels to Prague, Czech Republic, to sign the new arms reduction treaty with Russia and the week before he holds an international nuclear summit in Washington.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE LOS ANGELES TIMES</strong><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-nukes7-2010apr07,0,4068019.story" target="_blank">:  Obama&#8217;s nuclear policy walks careful line &#8211; latimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/obamas-nuclear-something-for-the-left-right-los-angeles-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ECONOMY RECOVERY?  Blockbuster, Borders &amp; Rite Aid &#8216;On The Edge Of Bankruptcy&#8217; (Investopedia.com)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/economy-recovery-blockbuster-borders-rite-aid-on-the-edge-of-bankruptcy-investopedia-com/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/economy-recovery-blockbuster-borders-rite-aid-on-the-edge-of-bankruptcy-investopedia-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borders & Rite Aid 'On The Edge Of Bankruptcy']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY RECOVERY? Blockbuster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many major companies like Circuit City and Linens &#8216;n Things went bankrupt during the economic crisis of 2008-2009. These companies folded under high debt levels and a decline in sales. Just because some companies were able to survive the economic downturn of the past few years doesn&#8217;t mean they are out of the woods yet. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many major companies like Circuit City and Linens &#8216;n Things went <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bankruptcy.asp">bankrupt</a> during the economic crisis of 2008-2009. These companies folded under high debt levels and a decline in <a class="iAs" style="border-bottom: 0.075em solid darkgreen ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; font-size: 100% ! important; text-decoration: underline ! important; padding-bottom: 1px ! important; color: darkgreen ! important; background-color: transparent ! important; background-image: none; padding-top: 0pt; padding-right: 0pt; padding-left: 0pt;" href="http://financialedge.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0410/Businesses-On-The-Brink-Change-Or-Fail.aspx#" target="_blank">sales</a>. Just because some companies were able to survive the economic downturn of the past few years doesn&#8217;t mean they are out of the woods yet. Companies like Blockbuster (NYSE:<a href="http://simulator.investopedia.com/stocks/BBI">BBI</a>) and Borders (NYSE:<a href="http://simulator.investopedia.com/stocks/BGP">BGP</a>) are going down with their industries, meaning that making drastic changes is their only option. Here are five major companies that are struggling &#8211; it is unlikely that all will survive.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK TO INVESTOPEDIA.COM</strong><a href="http://financialedge.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0410/Businesses-On-The-Brink-Change-Or-Fail.aspx">:  Businesses On The Brink: Change Or Fail? &#8211; Investopedia.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/economy-recovery-blockbuster-borders-rite-aid-on-the-edge-of-bankruptcy-investopedia-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 New Taxes Laws You Need To Know About (Bankrate.com)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/7-new-taxes-laws-you-need-to-know-about-bankrate-com/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/7-new-taxes-laws-you-need-to-know-about-bankrate-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7 New Taxes Laws You Need To Know About]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and some old tax laws with new amounts adjusted for inflation.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and us consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as well as for certain residential improvements. Uncle Sam now pays more of some educational costs. Some workers get bigger tax benefits to offset their commute to work. Folks who no longer have jobs ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facing a struggling economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for autos and home purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmakers in Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moving again. Most of the tax changes were part of the stimulus package enacted last February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[or in some cases expanded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax breaks were created]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. There are seven new tax laws you should know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turned to the tax code to help get it]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facing a struggling economy, lawmakers in Washington, D.C., turned to the tax code to help get it, and us consumers, moving again. Most of the tax changes were part of the stimulus package enacted last February, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. There are seven new tax laws you should know, and some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="_SE_FLD"><strong>Facing a struggling economy, lawmakers in Washington, D.C., turned to the tax code to help get it, and us consumers, moving again. Most of the tax changes were part of the stimulus package enacted last February, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. There are seven new tax laws you should know, and some <a title="20100129-5-old-tax-laws-with-new-amounts" href="http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/5-old-tax-laws-with-new-amounts-1.aspx">old tax laws with new amounts</a> adjusted for inflation.</strong></span></p>
<p><span id="_SE_FLD">Tax breaks were created, or in some cases expanded, for autos and home purchases, as well as for certain residential improvements. Uncle Sam now pays more of some educational costs. Some workers get bigger tax benefits to offset their commute to work. Folks who no longer have jobs at least get some tax relief. Even how you pay your IRS bill could turn into a deduction.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a look at some popular tax laws that could come in handy as you work on your 2009 tax return.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/7-new-tax-laws-to-know-1.aspx?ec_id=brmint_newsalert_20100407"><span id="_SE_FLD"><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK TO BANKRATE.COM</strong></span>7 new tax laws to know</a>.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/7-new-taxes-laws-you-need-to-know-about-bankrate-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Ways To Reduce Your Energy Bill (Yahoo!)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/6-ways-to-reduce-your-energy-bill-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/6-ways-to-reduce-your-energy-bill-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1. Check this: refrigerators suck up a whopping 20% of your household electricity use. Time to turn them down! Aim for somewhere between 38-42 degrees in the fridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6 Ways To Reduce Your Energy Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and 0-5 degrees in the freezer. If you've got an energy saver switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it's time to replace the gaskets.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[make sure it's flipped on. Doors should be sealed tight: to test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[painless ways to cut back:]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stick a dollar bill between the gaskets and close the fridge door; if the bill is hard to pull out you're in good shape. If not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There are a bunch of little tricks you can employ to cut back on power consumption at home—which not only has environmental benefits but keeps you from wasting cash too—and it's highly unlikely you'll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a bunch of little tricks you can employ to cut back on power consumption at home—which not only has environmental benefits but keeps you from wasting cash too—and it&#8217;s highly unlikely you&#8217;ll even notice a difference. Between the National Resources Defense Council&#8217;s site and powerscorecard.org I found some really good tips. Here&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a bunch of little tricks you can employ to cut back on power consumption at home—which not only has environmental benefits but keeps you from wasting cash too—and it&#8217;s highly unlikely you&#8217;ll even notice a difference. Between the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nrdc.org/air/energy/genergy.asp">National Resources Defense Council&#8217;s site</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.powerscorecard.org/reduce_energy.cfm">powerscorecard.org</a> I found some really good tips. Here&#8217;s a re-cap of six simple, painless ways to cut back:</p>
<p>1. Check this: refrigerators suck up a whopping 20% of your household electricity use. Time to turn them down! Aim for somewhere between 38-42 degrees in the fridge, and 0-5 degrees in the freezer. If you&#8217;ve got an energy saver switch, make sure it&#8217;s flipped on. Doors should be sealed tight: to test, stick a dollar bill between the gaskets and close the fridge door; if the bill is hard to pull out you&#8217;re in good shape. If not, it&#8217;s time to replace the gaskets.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK TO YAHOO!</strong><a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/event/haven/save-power-save-money-6-easy-tips-to-reduce-your-electricity-usage-and-bills-1243446/" target="_blank"> Save power, save money: 6 easy tips to reduce your electricity usage and bills on Shine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/6-ways-to-reduce-your-energy-bill-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why The Unemployment Rate Will Continue To Be High For Sometime (U.S. News)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/why-the-unemployment-rate-will-continue-to-be-high-for-sometime-u-s-news/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/why-the-unemployment-rate-will-continue-to-be-high-for-sometime-u-s-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" says Josh Bivens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 jobs were created in March. But a second survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 jobs—for the month of March.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 workers onto their payrolls in March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[according to the Labor Department's monthly jobs report.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an economist at the Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[But even with this spike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but it's not the kind of job growth that we need to really start working off the jobs hole we're in."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.-based Economic Policy Institute. "[The March numbers are] essentially job growth consistent with a stable unemployment rate. So it's good that they're not consistent with a rising one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers tacked a net total of 162]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flooding the market. There are two monthly metrics that determine the rate of job growth. The main measure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In a sign that the labor market is inching toward a recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indicated that 162]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is the one that's used to calculate the unemployment rate. That poll showed even more robust job creation—somewhere in the neighborhood of 264]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the unemployment rate remains unchanged at 9.7 percent. And chances are it won't budge anytime soon. "We are recovering painfully slowly in the job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[which polls individual households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[which stems from a survey of employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why The Unemployment Rate Will Continue To Be High For Sometime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Unemployment Rate Refuses to Budge &#8211; US News and World Report.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.usnews.com/money/careers/articles/2010/04/02/why-the-unemployment-rate-refuses-to-budge.html'>Why the Unemployment Rate Refuses to Budge &#8211; US News and World Report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/why-the-unemployment-rate-will-continue-to-be-high-for-sometime-u-s-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trying To Save Money?  5 Billionaires Show You How (Investopedia)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/trying-to-save-money-5-billionaires-show-you-how-investopedia/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/trying-to-save-money-5-billionaires-show-you-how-investopedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[500 more than 50 years ago. Although he's dined in the best restaurants around the globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[At least once in your life - maybe even once a week or once a day for that matter - you have fantasized about coming into a lot of money. What would you do if you were worth millions or even billions?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkshire Hathaway's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eschews opulent homes and luxury items. He and his wife still live in their modest home in Omaha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[every move. But the real secret to Buffett's personal fortune may be his penchant for frugality. Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[given the choice he would opt for a good burger and fries accompanied by a cold cherry Coke. When asked why he doesn't own a yacht he responded "Most toys are just a pain in the neck." (Find out how h]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska which they purchased for just $31]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[run-of-the-mill people. Take a peek at some of the most frugal wealthy people in the world.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trying To Save Money? 5 Billionaires Show You How]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett Millions of people read Buffett's books and follow his firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who is worth an estimated $47 billion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least once in your life &#8211; maybe even once a week or once a day for that matter &#8211; you have fantasized about coming into a lot of money. What would you do if you were worth millions or even billions?  Believe it or not there are millionaires and billionaires among us who masquerade [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least once in your life &#8211; maybe even once a week or once a day for that matter &#8211; you have fantasized about coming into a lot of money. What would you do if you were worth millions or even billions?  Believe it or not there are millionaires and billionaires among us who masquerade as relatively normal, run-of-the-mill people. Take a peek at some of the most frugal wealthy people in the world.</p>
<p><strong>Warren Buffett<br />
</strong>Millions of people read Buffett&#8217;s books and follow his firm, <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/berkshire-hathaway.asp">Berkshire Hathaway</a>&#8217;s, every move. But the real secret to Buffett&#8217;s personal fortune may be his penchant for frugality. Buffett, who is worth an estimated $47 billion, eschews <a class="iAs" style="border-bottom: 0.075em solid darkgreen ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; font-size: 100% ! important; text-decoration: underline ! important; padding-bottom: 1px ! important; color: darkgreen ! important; background-color: transparent ! important; background-image: none; padding-top: 0pt; padding-right: 0pt; padding-left: 0pt;" href="http://financialedge.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0410/5-Billionaires-Who-Live-Below-Their-Means.aspx#" target="_blank">opulent</a> homes and luxury items. He and his wife still live in their modest home in Omaha, Nebraska which they purchased for just $31,500 more than 50 years ago. Although he&#8217;s dined in the best restaurants around the globe, given the choice he would opt for a good burger and fries accompanied by a cold cherry Coke. When asked why he doesn&#8217;t own a yacht he responded &#8220;Most toys are just a pain in the neck.&#8221; (Find out how he went from selling soft drinks to buying up companies and making billions of dollars. Read <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/08/buffetts-road-to-riches.asp"><em>Warren Buffett: The Road To Riches</em></a>.)</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK TO INVESTOPEDIA: </strong> <a href="http://financialedge.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0410/5-Billionaires-Who-Live-Below-Their-Means.aspx" target="_blank">5 Billionaires Who Live Below Their Means &#8211; Investopedia.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/trying-to-save-money-5-billionaires-show-you-how-investopedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

