<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Help The Middle Class &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://helpthemiddleclass.com/category/news/politics-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com</link>
	<description>News and Information For The Heart Of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fannie Mae Executives Face Probe.  Must Explain Risky Mortage Decisions (Yahoo! News)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/fannie-mae-executives-face-probe-must-explain-risky-mortage-decisions-yahoo-news/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/fannie-mae-executives-face-probe-must-explain-risky-mortage-decisions-yahoo-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" Levin told the panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Could we really sit out? Would we be permitted to sit out? That's what we were grappling with."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["It posed a number of threats to the company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and Robert Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[As the market turned down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Both executives left Washington-based Fannie Mae after it was seized by regulators in fall 2008. Also scheduled to appear Friday were James Lockhart and Armando Falcon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[both of whom headed up the federal regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combined with the political goal of increasing homeownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Mudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae Executives Face Probe. Must Explain Risky Mortage Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae's former chief executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levin said company executives were concerned about losing relevance as Wall Street companies issued mortgage securities and stole market share.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mudd noted "virtually every other housing sector investor fled the market." Fannie and sibling company Freddie Mac "were specifically required to take up the slack."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testified before a panel examining the roots of the financial crisis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the company's former chief business officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two former Fannie Mae executives said Friday that competitive pressures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[were to blame for the company's decision to back riskier mortgages that fueled the housing bubble.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two former Fannie Mae executives said Friday that competitive pressures, combined with the political goal of increasing homeownership, were to blame for the company&#8217;s decision to back riskier mortgages that fueled the housing bubble.
Daniel Mudd, Fannie Mae&#8217;s former chief executive, and Robert Levin, the company&#8217;s former chief business officer, testified before a panel examining the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two former <span id="lw_1270825069_0" class="yshortcuts">Fannie Mae executives</span> said Friday that competitive pressures, combined with the political goal of increasing homeownership, were to blame for the company&#8217;s decision to back riskier mortgages that fueled the housing bubble.</p>
<p><span id="lw_1270825069_1" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; cursor: pointer;">Daniel Mudd</span>, <span id="lw_1270825069_2" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">Fannie Mae</span>&#8217;s former chief executive, and Robert Levin, the company&#8217;s former chief business officer, testified before a panel examining the roots of the <span id="lw_1270825069_3" class="yshortcuts">financial crisis</span>.</p>
<p>Levin said company executives were concerned about losing relevance as <span id="lw_1270825069_4" class="yshortcuts">Wall Street companies</span> issued mortgage securities and stole market share.</p>
<p>&#8220;It posed a number of threats to the company,&#8221; Levin told the panel, adding, &#8220;Could we really sit out? Would we be permitted to sit out? That&#8217;s what we were grappling with.&#8221;</p>
<p>As the market turned down, Mudd noted &#8220;virtually every other housing sector investor fled the market.&#8221; Fannie and sibling company <span id="lw_1270825069_5" class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 1px dashed #0066cc; cursor: pointer;">Freddie Mac</span> &#8220;were specifically required to take up the slack.&#8221;</p>
<p>Both executives left Washington-based Fannie Mae after it was seized by regulators in fall 2008. Also scheduled to appear Friday were James Lockhart and Armando Falcon, both of whom headed up the <span id="lw_1270825069_6" class="yshortcuts">federal regulator</span> for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.</p>
<p>The inquiry is being held by the congressionally chartered Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Congress created the commission last year to examine the causes of the crisis. The panel&#8217;s goal is to get an in-depth understanding of decisions that inflated the mortgage bubble and triggered a financial crisis that tipped the economy into the longest recession in 70 years. Its report is due Dec. 15.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK</strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100409/ap_on_bi_ge/us_meltdown_investigation" target="_blank">:  Ex-Fannie Mae execs try to defend track record &#8211; Yahoo! News</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/fannie-mae-executives-face-probe-must-explain-risky-mortage-decisions-yahoo-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Still Plans On &#8216;Redistribution Of Wealth&#8217; To Pay For Deficit (Los Angeles Times)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 and individuals making more than $200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 will not only pay new healthcare-related taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but also face the likely expiration of upper-income tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush. As a result]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faced with the need to pay for healthcare while also trying to rein in the deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families earning more than $250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Still Plans On 'Redistribution Of Wealth' To Pay For Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[see a chance to limit some of the political and economic pain by putting more of the burden on the country's highest earners. But Republicans are already hammering Obama for leading a broad-scale redi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[these Americans could be tapped for about $650 billion in additional taxes over the next 10 years -- a prospect that is loaded with both political opportunity and peril.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[With enactment of his signature healthcare law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Reporting from Washington

With enactment of his signature healthcare law, President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-income taxpayers, the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.
Families earning more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 20px;"></p>
<div class="storyDateline" style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px;">Reporting from Washington</div>
<p></span></p>
<p>With enactment of his signature healthcare law, President Obama has also made good on another major campaign promise: to ease the tax burden on middle-class Americans and pay for his domestic agenda by raising taxes on the wealthy. And for upper-income taxpayers, the tab for healthcare is just the beginning.</p>
<p>Families earning more than $250,000 and individuals making more than $200,000 will not only pay new healthcare-related taxes, but also face the likely expiration of upper-income tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush. As a result, these Americans could be tapped for about $650 billion in additional taxes over the next 10 years &#8212; a prospect that is loaded with both political opportunity and peril.</p>
<p>Obama and the Democratic majority in Congress, faced with the need to pay for healthcare while also trying to rein in the deficit, see a chance to limit some of the political and economic pain by putting more of the burden on the country&#8217;s highest earners. But Republicans are already hammering Obama for leading a broad-scale redistribution of income that could threaten the economic recovery.</p>
<p><strong><em>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE LOS ANGELES TIMES</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/health/healthcare/la-na-taxes8-2010apr08,0,4756651.story">Tax burden mounting for high earners &#8211; latimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/09/obama-still-plans-on-redistribution-of-wealth-to-pay-for-deficit-los-angeles-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Nuclear Policy, Something For The &#8216;Left &amp; Right&#8217; (Los Angeles Times)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/obamas-nuclear-something-for-the-left-right-los-angeles-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/obamas-nuclear-something-for-the-left-right-los-angeles-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration officials listened closely to the more conservative advice of Pentagon officials in a yearlong study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Although Obama campaigned on a pledge to overhaul nuclear policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as a step toward reducing U.S. reliance on its most destructive weapons.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declaring some countries off-limits even in wartime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[said people close to the discussions. And they were sensitive to the need to win Republican votes in the Senate for ratification this year of a new arms control treaty with Russia.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Something For The 'Left & Right']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The administration's hedge on the warhead issue was but one example of the caution built into a policy portrayed as a groundbreaking effort to reduce U.S. reliance on nuclear weapons.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The new policy came two days before Obama travels to Prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The nuclear weapons policy sets limits on the use of U.S. warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to sign the new arms reduction treaty with Russia and the week before he holds an international nuclear summit in Washington.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama and his senior aides introduced a new nuclear weapons policy Tuesday with the promise that America would no longer build new nuclear weapons.
&#8220;No new testing, no new warheads,&#8221; Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pledged in a Pentagon briefing.
Yet officials said later that the policy could allow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-9262" title="barack-obama-is-superman" src="http://helpthemiddleclass.com/wp-content/uploads/barack-obama-is-superman5-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />President Obama and his senior aides introduced a new nuclear weapons policy Tuesday with the promise that America would no longer build new nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>&#8220;No new testing, no new warheads,&#8221; Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pledged in a Pentagon briefing.</p>
<p>Yet officials said later that the policy could allow them to bring back older, tested warhead components and designs to build what would be, for all practical purposes, a new weapon.</p>
<p>The administration&#8217;s hedge on the warhead issue was but one example of the caution built into a policy portrayed as a groundbreaking effort to reduce U.S. reliance on nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>Although Obama campaigned on a pledge to overhaul nuclear policy, administration officials listened closely to the more conservative advice of Pentagon officials in a yearlong study, said people close to the discussions. And they were sensitive to the need to win Republican votes in the Senate for ratification this year of a new arms control treaty with Russia.</p>
<p>The nuclear weapons policy sets limits on the use of U.S. warheads, declaring some countries off-limits even in wartime, as a step toward reducing U.S. reliance on its most destructive weapons.</p>
<p>The new policy came two days before Obama travels to Prague, Czech Republic, to sign the new arms reduction treaty with Russia and the week before he holds an international nuclear summit in Washington.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE LOS ANGELES TIMES</strong><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-nukes7-2010apr07,0,4068019.story" target="_blank">:  Obama&#8217;s nuclear policy walks careful line &#8211; latimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/obamas-nuclear-something-for-the-left-right-los-angeles-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 New Taxes Laws You Need To Know About (Bankrate.com)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/7-new-taxes-laws-you-need-to-know-about-bankrate-com/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/7-new-taxes-laws-you-need-to-know-about-bankrate-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7 New Taxes Laws You Need To Know About]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and some old tax laws with new amounts adjusted for inflation.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and us consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as well as for certain residential improvements. Uncle Sam now pays more of some educational costs. Some workers get bigger tax benefits to offset their commute to work. Folks who no longer have jobs ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facing a struggling economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for autos and home purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmakers in Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moving again. Most of the tax changes were part of the stimulus package enacted last February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[or in some cases expanded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax breaks were created]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. There are seven new tax laws you should know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turned to the tax code to help get it]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facing a struggling economy, lawmakers in Washington, D.C., turned to the tax code to help get it, and us consumers, moving again. Most of the tax changes were part of the stimulus package enacted last February, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. There are seven new tax laws you should know, and some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="_SE_FLD"><strong>Facing a struggling economy, lawmakers in Washington, D.C., turned to the tax code to help get it, and us consumers, moving again. Most of the tax changes were part of the stimulus package enacted last February, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. There are seven new tax laws you should know, and some <a title="20100129-5-old-tax-laws-with-new-amounts" href="http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/5-old-tax-laws-with-new-amounts-1.aspx">old tax laws with new amounts</a> adjusted for inflation.</strong></span></p>
<p><span id="_SE_FLD">Tax breaks were created, or in some cases expanded, for autos and home purchases, as well as for certain residential improvements. Uncle Sam now pays more of some educational costs. Some workers get bigger tax benefits to offset their commute to work. Folks who no longer have jobs at least get some tax relief. Even how you pay your IRS bill could turn into a deduction.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a look at some popular tax laws that could come in handy as you work on your 2009 tax return.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/7-new-tax-laws-to-know-1.aspx?ec_id=brmint_newsalert_20100407"><span id="_SE_FLD"><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK TO BANKRATE.COM</strong></span>7 new tax laws to know</a>.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/07/7-new-taxes-laws-you-need-to-know-about-bankrate-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why The Unemployment Rate Will Continue To Be High For Sometime (U.S. News)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/why-the-unemployment-rate-will-continue-to-be-high-for-sometime-u-s-news/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/why-the-unemployment-rate-will-continue-to-be-high-for-sometime-u-s-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" says Josh Bivens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 jobs were created in March. But a second survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 jobs—for the month of March.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 workers onto their payrolls in March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[according to the Labor Department's monthly jobs report.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[an economist at the Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[But even with this spike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but it's not the kind of job growth that we need to really start working off the jobs hole we're in."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.-based Economic Policy Institute. "[The March numbers are] essentially job growth consistent with a stable unemployment rate. So it's good that they're not consistent with a rising one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers tacked a net total of 162]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flooding the market. There are two monthly metrics that determine the rate of job growth. The main measure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In a sign that the labor market is inching toward a recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indicated that 162]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is the one that's used to calculate the unemployment rate. That poll showed even more robust job creation—somewhere in the neighborhood of 264]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the unemployment rate remains unchanged at 9.7 percent. And chances are it won't budge anytime soon. "We are recovering painfully slowly in the job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[which polls individual households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[which stems from a survey of employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why The Unemployment Rate Will Continue To Be High For Sometime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the Unemployment Rate Refuses to Budge &#8211; US News and World Report.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.usnews.com/money/careers/articles/2010/04/02/why-the-unemployment-rate-refuses-to-budge.html'>Why the Unemployment Rate Refuses to Budge &#8211; US News and World Report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/04/why-the-unemployment-rate-will-continue-to-be-high-for-sometime-u-s-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Growth of Unpaid Internships May Be Illegal, Officials Say (New York Times)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/growth-of-unpaid-internships-may-be-illegal-officials-say-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/growth-of-unpaid-internships-may-be-illegal-officials-say-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit & Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as the federal Labor Department’s top law enforcement official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but that it is unusually hard to mount a major enforcement effort because interns are often afraid to file complaints. Many fear they will become known as troublemakers in their chosen field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California and other states have begun investigations and fined employers. Last year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convinced that many unpaid internships violate minimum wage laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangering their chances with a potential future employer.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth of Unpaid Internships May Be Illegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leading federal and state regulators to worry that more employers are illegally using such internships for free labor.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M. Patricia Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Many regulators say that violations are widespread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[officials in Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Officials Say]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordered investigations into several firms’ internships. Now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[she and the wage and hour division are stepping up enforcement nationwide.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the number of unpaid internships has climbed in recent years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[then New York’s labor commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[With job openings scarce for young people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With job openings scarce for young people, the number of unpaid internships has climbed in recent years, leading federal and state regulators to worry that more employers are illegally using such internships for free labor.
Convinced that many unpaid internships violate minimum wage laws, officials in Oregon, California and other states have begun investigations and fined [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With job openings scarce for young people, the number of unpaid internships has climbed in recent years, leading federal and state regulators to worry that more employers are illegally using such internships for free labor.</p>
<p>Convinced that many unpaid internships violate minimum wage laws, officials in Oregon, California and other states have begun investigations and fined employers. Last year, M. Patricia Smith, then New York’s labor commissioner, ordered investigations into several firms’ internships. Now, as the federal Labor Department’s top law enforcement official, she and the wage and hour division are stepping up enforcement nationwide.</p>
<p>Many regulators say that violations are widespread, but that it is unusually hard to mount a major enforcement effort because interns are often afraid to file complaints. Many fear they will become known as troublemakers in their chosen field, endangering their chances with a potential future employer.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES:</strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/03/business/03intern.html?src=me&amp;ref=general" target="_blank"> Growth of Unpaid Internships May Be Illegal, Officials Say &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/growth-of-unpaid-internships-may-be-illegal-officials-say-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA/Gallop Poll:  More Now Blame Obama For Economic Woes (USA Today)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/usagallop-poll-more-now-blame-obama-for-economic-woes-usa-today/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/usagallop-poll-more-now-blame-obama-for-economic-woes-usa-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A majority disapprove of both political parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans seem disaffected about nearly everything political.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attitudes are reminiscent of those in 1994 and 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More Now Blame Obama For Economic Woes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seven months before the midterm elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The favorable rating for the Democratic Party has fallen to its lowest level since Gallup began asking the question in 1992 —its standing has dropped 14 percentage points since President Obama's elect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their leaders and most members of Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[when control of Congress switched from one party to the other.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven months before the midterm elections, Americans seem disaffected about nearly everything political.
A majority disapprove of both political parties, their leaders and most members of Congress, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds.
Attitudes are reminiscent of those in 1994 and 2006, when control of Congress switched from one party to the other.
The favorable rating for the Democratic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seven months before the midterm elections, <a title="More news, photos about Americans" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Places,+Geography/Countries/United+States">Americans</a> seem disaffected about nearly everything political.</p>
<p class="inside-copy">A majority disapprove of both political parties, their leaders and most members of Congress, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds.</p>
<p class="inside-copy">Attitudes are reminiscent of those in 1994 and 2006, when control of Congress switched from one party to the other.</p>
<p class="inside-copy">The favorable rating for the <a title="More news, photos about Democratic" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Organizations/Political+Bodies/Democratic+Party">Democratic</a> Party has fallen to its lowest level since Gallup began asking the question in 1992 —its standing has dropped 14 percentage points since President <a title="More news, photos about Obama" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/People/Politicians,+Government+Officials,+Strategists/Executive/Barack+Obama">Obama</a>&#8217;s election — but the <a title="More news, photos about Republican" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Organizations/Political+Bodies/Republican+Party">Republican</a> Party fares no better. Three of four Americans say they are dissatisfied with the country&#8217;s direction.</p>
<p class="inside-copy">The good feeling that welcomed Obama with the departure of President <a title="More news, photos about George W. Bush" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/People/Politicians,+Government+Officials,+Strategists/Executive/George+W.+Bush">George W. Bush</a> seems to have dissipated amid continued concerns about the economy and a growing willingness to hold the new president responsible for the nation&#8217;s travails.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR USA TODAY</strong>:   <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-03-31-1Apoll_N.htm" target="_blank">USA fumes over politics &#8211; USATODAY.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/03/usagallop-poll-more-now-blame-obama-for-economic-woes-usa-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN/OPINION:  U.S.-Mexico &#8216;War On Drugs&#8217; A Failure (CNN)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/02/cnnopinion-u-s-mexico-war-on-drugs-a-failure-cnn/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/02/cnnopinion-u-s-mexico-war-on-drugs-a-failure-cnn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 19:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug-Free America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" about Ciudad Juarez. He is a contributing editor of Esquire and writes for newspapers and magazines such as Harper's and The New York Times Book Review.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Murder City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 army and police officers.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona (CNN) -- Last week during the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminals involved in the drug business. The killings of reporters and of innocent women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's note: Charles Bowden is the author of 11 books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guys got out and executed a 13-year-old boy. And then they drove away]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[including "Down by the River: Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men and children continually belie that statement.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder and Family"; "Juárez: The Laboratory of our Future"; "Some of the Dead Are Still Breathing" and his latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[some kids in Ciudad Juarez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mexican government repeatedly states that 90 percent of the deaths in the current drug war are of people who are dirty; that is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.-Mexico 'War On Drugs' A Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unmolested in a city with 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[were playing soccer in a park when a car slowed down]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor&#8217;s note: Charles Bowden is the author of 11 books, including &#8220;Down by the River: Drugs, Money, Murder and Family&#8221;; &#8220;Juárez: The Laboratory of our Future&#8221;; &#8220;Some of the Dead Are Still Breathing&#8221; and his latest, &#8220;Murder City,&#8221; about Ciudad Juarez. He is a contributing editor of Esquire and writes for newspapers and magazines such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="cnnEditorialNote"><em><strong>Editor&#8217;s note:</strong> Charles Bowden is the author of 11 books, including &#8220;Down by the River: Drugs, Money, Murder and Family&#8221;; &#8220;Juárez: The Laboratory of our Future&#8221;; &#8220;Some of the Dead Are Still Breathing&#8221; and his latest, &#8220;Murder City,&#8221; about Ciudad Juarez. He is a contributing editor of Esquire and writes for newspapers and magazines such as Harper&#8217;s and The New York Times Book Review. </em></p>
<p><strong>Tucson, Arizona (CNN) </strong> &#8212; Last week during the day, some kids in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, were playing soccer in a park when a car slowed down, guys got out and executed a 13-year-old boy. And then they drove away, unmolested in a city with 11,000 army and police officers.</p>
<p>The Mexican government repeatedly states that 90 percent of the deaths in the current drug war are of people who are dirty; that is, criminals involved in the drug business. The killings of reporters and of innocent women, men and children continually belie that statement.</p>
<p>The child was not a cartel member in disguise. Nor were the 15 high school kids killed at a party in a small house in a poor barrio. Their parents had made them hold the celebration of a sports victory at home because it was too dangerous to be out in the city.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR CNN</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/31/bowden.ciudad.juarez.cartels/index.html?hpt=C2">U.S.-Mexico &#8216;war on drugs&#8217; a failure &#8211; CNN.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/02/cnnopinion-u-s-mexico-war-on-drugs-a-failure-cnn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment Holds Steady At 9.7%.  Temp. Hirings Up March Job Figures (Politico)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/02/unemployment-holds-steady-at-9-7-temp-hirings-up-march-job-figures-politico/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/02/unemployment-holds-steady-at-9-7-temp-hirings-up-march-job-figures-politico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business/Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor/Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Job News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[* Tony Fratto Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35325.html#ixzz0jxHENiau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 jobs in the month of March. Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35325.html#ixzz0jxHJHt3J]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[as new government figures showed the nation gained 162]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureau of labor statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama got the first unequivocally good news on the nation’s employment picture Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timothy geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Holds Steady At 9.7%. Temp. Hirings Up March Job Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama got the first unequivocally good news on the nation’s employment picture Friday, as new government figures showed the nation gained 162,000 jobs in the month of March.
The unemployment rate held steady at 9.7 percent. That’s the first time the nation has gained, rather than lost, in jobs since late 2007, with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama got the first unequivocally good news on the nation’s employment picture Friday, as new government figures showed the nation gained 162,000 jobs in the month of March.</p>
<p>The unemployment rate held steady at 9.7 percent. That’s the first time the nation has gained, rather than lost, in jobs since late 2007, with the exception of November 2009, which many economists saw as a fluke.</p>
<p>Reversing the unrelenting jobs decline has been a central goal of the Obama administration, and it has been politically crucial for Democrats to demonstrate progress on the jobs front ahead of the midterm elections in November.</p>
<p>The news will not have an immediate effect on the stock market, where the Dow has been surging toward the psychologically important 11,000 marker this week because Wall Street is closed today for Good Friday.</p>
<p>The employment number was not high enough to beat expectations of many economists who were looking for a gain of 200,000 or more.</p>
<p>Many economists say that about 150,000 of the new jobs can be explained away by the combination of a bounce-back effect from the February snowstorms, as snowed in workers got back to their job sites in March and by massive temporary hiring by the U.S. Census of as many as 50,000 canvassers.</p>
<p><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR POLITICO: </strong>Read more: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35325.html#ixzz0jxGzqGUQ" target="_blank">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35325.html#ixzz0jxGzqGUQ</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35325.html">Jobs up, good news for President Obama &#8211; Eamon Javers &#8211; POLITICO.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/02/unemployment-holds-steady-at-9-7-temp-hirings-up-march-job-figures-politico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Poll Shows People Believe America Is Going In The &#8216;Wrong Direction&#8217; (MSNBC)</title>
		<link>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/01/new-poll-shows-people-believe-america-is-going-in-the-wrong-direction-msnbc/</link>
		<comments>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/01/new-poll-shows-people-believe-america-is-going-in-the-wrong-direction-msnbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Man In The Middle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" said Hugh Pearson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["I grew up in the '50s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['Leave It to Beaver'-type stuff. Now we have all this MTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[63]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a retired builder from Bakersfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and those who say they are outright angry almost universally believe that the country is going in the wrong direction — some say toward an America they no longer recognize.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and we have no morality left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calif. "That was a wonderful time. Nobody was getting rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expose-yourself stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[many went beyond health care as they spoke of their deep misgivings about the country's leadership and the changes taking place around them.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Poll Shows People Believe America Is Going In The 'Wrong Direction']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobody was doing everything big. But it was 'Ozzie and Harriet' days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not even by the legislators."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Of the 26 percent of people who described themselves as "angry" about the new law in a recent Washington Post poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The health-care debate has generated intense levels of frustration among the bill's opponents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtually all also said the country was on the wrong track. In follow-up interviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpthemiddleclass.com/?p=9224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The health-care debate has generated intense levels of frustration among the bill&#8217;s opponents, and those who say they are outright angry almost universally believe that the country is going in the wrong direction — some say toward an America they no longer recognize.
Of the 26 percent of people who described themselves as &#8220;angry&#8221; about the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The health-care debate has generated intense levels of frustration among the bill&#8217;s opponents, and those who say they are outright angry almost universally believe that the country is going in the wrong direction — some say toward an America they no longer recognize.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">Of the 26 percent of people who described themselves as &#8220;angry&#8221; about the new law in a recent <a class="iAs" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted darkgreen ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; font-size: 100% ! important; text-decoration: none ! important; padding-bottom: 0px ! important; color: darkgreen ! important; background-color: transparent ! important; background-image: none; padding-top: 0pt; padding-right: 0pt; padding-left: 0pt;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36142207/ns/politics-washington_post/#" target="_blank">Washington Post<img style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: inline ! important; height: 10px; width: 10px; position: relative; top: 1px; left: 1px; float: none;" src="http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif" alt="" /></a> poll, virtually all also said the country was on the wrong track. In follow-up interviews, many went beyond health care as they spoke of their deep misgivings about the country&#8217;s leadership and the changes taking place around them.</p>
<p class="textBodyBlack">&#8220;I grew up in the &#8217;50s,&#8221; said Hugh Pearson, 63, a retired builder from Bakersfield, Calif. &#8220;That was a wonderful time. Nobody was getting rich, nobody was doing everything big. But it was &#8216;Ozzie and Harriet&#8217; days, &#8216;Leave It to Beaver&#8217;-type stuff. Now we have all this MTV, expose-yourself stuff, and we have no morality left, not even by the legislators.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36142207/ns/politics-washington_post/" target="_blank"><strong>TO CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE, CLICK THIS LINK FOR MSNBC. </strong>Post poll shows anger over health-care debate &#8211; Washington Post- msnbc.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://helpthemiddleclass.com/2010/04/01/new-poll-shows-people-believe-america-is-going-in-the-wrong-direction-msnbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

